My next encyclopedia

is under progress

Encyclopedias

I may author up to 12 encyclopedias in a categorical scheme

The first title is Symbolism, Linguistics, Sidereality, and Acoletics

Complete but unpublished, 256 pages

For those interested in an unprecedented categoric encyclopedia, contact me:

drypress@yahoo.com,
contact@nathancoppedge.com, or
terrapin@impossiblemachine.com

Based on quadrant theory, originally Descartes, formalized by a kind of Kantianism

Distribution

Bullet Books in a discursive list-type format have been disbursed at local cafeterias

See the following if you're lucky:

Not to Speak of Three Minds: a Miniature Psychological Treatise
The Little Manual: a Ladder of Proofs
Terrapin's Quotidiams Epigrams
PithAegis: The Transcept of Reason
The Ismic Codex: Several Dotologies
The Poeitic City of Berets and Plumes
The Book of Apertures: on Metaphorical Architecture

Also, The Book of Simple is a one-page document on the secret meanings of vegetables

Economy Secrets and Volitional Proportionitics are each 12-page documents on secret information, egg what Euclid or Greenspan won't teach you

A MORAL TRACTATUS OF SORTS

(begin page)

I

[[[[consider with whole-paper graphical accuracy in American English for relevant reason]:]]]

[[[Rules as Real Law, to Explain]:]]

[[1 if DEVIL matters]:]

[1 also if of DEVIL as of others, if seperately judged, [as others in themselves seperately from one another]:]

[1 not for devil as anything except what is [Good or good] for the devil: Good or good must be very well]

[1 Devil extreme case [of a being-as-devil]]


[[[[[line of local relevance defined conceptually by numeral to logical limit of brackets thus:]]]]]


(end page)
(begin page)

II

[[[[consider with whole-paper graphical accuracy in American English for relevant reason:]]]]

[[[Logic of the Reality of Sin-Judged]:]]

[[[line concept is relating concepts:]]]

[[if context is sin]:]

[sinners sin by virtue]

[virtue is virtue [imperative]]

[[[caveat:idea:]]]

[[problem with above graphics statements: sin conflicts with virtue by resembling or denying virtue]]

[[idea: inherent problem of sinners is false-'good-being' or 'disintegrated good-being' or 'absence of the good']]

[[[[[line of local relevance defined conceptually by numeral to logical limit of brackets thus:]]]]]


(end page)
(begin page)

III

[[[consider with whole-paper graphical accuracy in American English for relevant reason:]]]

[[One Logic Item for Any Good Life, Idea]:]

[[line concept is relating concepts]]

[[hidden costs substantiated by injustice in precedent alone may be substantiated in some reason by progress, only when progress is justified['in' or within justice]'with reason'[reasonably, by thought of reason that works here by this reason explained]]

[in such a case as above 'individual' or ['personal-self effecting harms by injustice'[premise: demanded]] may be specifically and [premise: exclusively] substantiated by the justice of transcendence [conceived by 'progress' and 'self-being-process-of-being-selves']]

[[[[line of local relevance defined conceptually by numeral to logical limit of brackets thus:]]]]

(end page)
(begin page)

IIII : IV

[[consider with whole-paper graphical accuracy in American English for relevant reason:]]

['justice of now' is not sometimes conceived as just if justice is not justice]

[justice is justice[imperative]]

['the just of now' requires at least the qualification of 'justice' and 'now' when 'just' is qualifier of 'justice']

[[[line of local relevance defined conceptually by numeral to logical limit of brackets thus:]]]

(end page)
(begin page)

IIIII : V

[[[consider with whole-paper graphical accuracy in American English for relevant reason]]]

[[Moral Inherency Determines Morals by Cleanliness of Principles]]

[the principle of moral humility is confusion on the subject of pride with clear feeling]

[the principle of good begging is to ask what is desired by beggars alone]

[the greatest moral perview of thieving is to take what begs to be taken]

[a view of law that is not immoral is that those that are just may be crazy when they are good]

[[[[line of local relevance defined conceptually by numeral to logical limit of brackets thus:]]]]

(end page)

Tangerin et Veridienne

A Miniature Manifesto on Hypercubism (Hypercubics, the application of categorics as a media)

Landscapes of hyperdimension illuminate that limnus or litmus between the geometric and poetic ideal, in the interest of woodblocks and vignettes sine quo non in ink and watercolor form

A conceptual scene produces contexts of contrast and realization; dimensional loops, smooth sides and bending angles in which a thought experiment or religious icon may be at home

On an earlier article concerning Qualific Operators

It may serve to clarify that the earlier article on qualifics deals not essentially with the death of mathematics in any erroneous or far-blown poetical sensibility (although it is a poetical sensibility; to say it is poetic for the sake of destroying mathematics would be erroneous or even specious by induction) so much as with categorics as an interpretive system akin to philosophy, that is dealing inhensively--inherently and iteratively or correlatively--with words, thereby replacing in one frame of vision a context for holistic systemology with a context for the holistic systemologization of methods comparable or analogous to math and math systems;

Where in one context a few pieces may be moved to make a beautiful battlefield of math operators as chess pieces, in a further frame of reference initial pieces are partly defined solely by the field of play; if a field is itself an operator, it is arbitrary and erroneous to pick one field alone; this isn't to say that math isn't real, but rather than the just field of correspondence is a 'mutualization' of context-concepts in a balanced manner; otherwise field may fail to define the operator;

Rejecting this previous discourse as in some way typical and fallible (under the context of math itself), the conclusion becomes under a simplification that a math of fields or math of maths is to be emphasized in defining math per se; it could be that my experience is limited enough that these things are real as a prefigurement of any real math concepts; in another framework, the framework of the previous article-as-valid, theory-concepts such as thought experiments may be the higher form of a ground for math itself; it may be that small initial compromises, seeming small, create drastic errors such as the notorious unsolvability problem;

In that context, the proposition of the 'death of math' is not so much a declaration against the validity of numbers and number-theory as it is a dismissal of conclusions drawn under the espousal of 'towers' of theory dependant on a ground that is not theory-consistent; the self-devouring logic is of two faces then: one in which it gains two faces by dependence on 'fundamentals' as a ground (with the acknowledgement of variance at high levels) and another in which theory-coherence or field-coherent thought at basis provides a ground for the contextualization OF contextualization at high levels of thought; in the second case contextualization is already prefigured by the addresal of the contextual idea in the contextual pretext; in the first case there is a duplicity between the presumption of the fundamental and the erratic brilliance of stepping beyond 'ground's idea' so posited;

By positing that the basic is basic, from a certain perspective coherence is compromised; the addresal of coherence is also the addresal intrinsically of fundamental coherence, that is the field-specificity of original idea, at the most pithy level afforded; this is not to say that the operator is divine or describes all math (because inherently math is more holistic than its terms, or may lose reality) instead rather that system in some forms embodies an equivalence to its operators; it is not that system is extensible with the right tools, instead rather as systems and tools gain specificity or perfection, a gain is made in proportion to equivalence, perhaps via the relavence of field or field-coherence;

As an idea I don't know how this applies except through a dimensional and categoric framework I've called Motism or Hypercubism (the second closer to artwork than anything systemic); its possible ideas of beauty embodied in Eridianism or Limnics in their brightness are coherent with systems thinking, however the connection has been limited consciously to me only to symbological representations and not anything strictly rational, except as a sort of poetic game;